Fear of flying affects millions of Australians, with research demonstrating 25-40% experiencing some level of flight anxiety. This case study presents the successful treatment of a 39-year-old female retail store manager from Kalinga, Queensland, experiencing moderate aviophobia characterised by external locus of control patterns and catastrophic thinking. The client presented with elevated baseline scores: DASS-21 Anxiety (13), DASS-21 Stress (10), DAS (135), and SUDS (6). Clinical formulation revealed an External Locus of Control pattern with Global Attribution Style, addressed through targeted Skill Building and Reframing hypnotic devices. Following 3 hypnotherapy sessions over 7 weeks with daily audio reinforcement, outcomes demonstrated significant improvement: DASS-21 Anxiety reduced to 2 (85% improvement), stress levels decreased to 4 (60% improvement), dysfunctional attitudes shifted from 135 to 75 (44% improvement), and subjective distress dropped to 2 (67% improvement). This case illustrates the efficacy of pattern-specific hypnotherapy interventions in managing aviophobia.
The Challenge
The primary challenge lay in the client's deeply entrenched External Locus of Control pattern, which had generalised beyond aviation contexts to affect her overall sense of personal agency. This pattern was maintaining her anxiety through a cycle of perceived helplessness, where any aspect of flying that she couldn't directly control became a source of overwhelming distress. The Global/Stable Attribution Style further complicated treatment, as the client had constructed an identity around being 'someone who can't fly', making the condition feel permanent and unchangeable. Her tendency to magnify potential threats whilst diminishing her own coping resources created a cognitive environment where rational information about flight safety was consistently overridden by emotional catastrophising.
The Process
The intervention utilised Skill Building as the primary hypnotic device to systematically transfer agency back to the client, directly counteracting the External Locus of Control pattern. The mechanism of action focused on developing internal resources and self-regulation capabilities that the client could access and control, regardless of external circumstances. This was complemented by Reframing techniques to restructure the catastrophic interpretations that maintained the magnifying perceptual style.
The protocol employed a standardised Elman induction followed by a progressive muscle relaxation deepener across all three sessions. The specific hypnotic intervention involved detailed visualisations of the client successfully utilising breathing techniques, grounding exercises, and cognitive reframing strategies during various phases of air travel. These skills were presented as learnable, controllable resources that remained within her sphere of influence.
Session 1 focused on establishing basic self-regulation skills through diaphragmatic breathing and progressive muscle relaxation, with post-hypnotic suggestions for daily practice. Session 2 introduced cognitive reframing techniques for transforming catastrophic thoughts into realistic assessments, emphasising the client's ability to choose her interpretations. Session 3 consolidated these skills through future pacing scenarios, allowing the client to rehearse successful coping whilst in hypnotic state.
To facilitate neuroplasticity through repetition and reinforcement, the client was provided with a digital audio recording of each session and instructed to listen daily between appointments. This ensured the therapeutic suggestions were maintained outside the clinical setting, creating the necessary 'dose' for cognitive pattern restructuring.
The Result
Quantitative outcomes demonstrated substantial improvement across all measured domains following the 3-session intervention:
| Measure | Baseline | Mid-Treatment | Post-Treatment | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASS-21 (Anxiety) | 13 | 11 | 2 | 85% |
| DASS-21 (Stress) | 10 | 5 | 4 | 60% |
| DAS (Cognitive Distortion) | 135 | 115 | 75 | 44% |
| SUDS (0-10) | 6 | 5 | 2 | 67% |
Qualitatively, the client reported a fundamental shift in her relationship with flying anxiety: 'I realise now that whilst I can't control the plane or the weather, I absolutely can control how I respond to those things. I have tools now that work, and I've practiced them enough that they feel natural. Flying still isn't my favourite thing, but it's no longer this insurmountable obstacle that controls my life choices.'
The most significant indicator of sustainable change was the reduction in DAS scores from 135 to 75, representing a fundamental shift from external to internal locus of control thinking patterns. This cognitive restructuring was reflected in the dramatic reduction of anxiety symptoms, with DASS-21 Anxiety scores dropping from moderate (13) to minimal (2) levels.
Introduction
Aviophobia, commonly known as fear of flying, represents a significant anxiety disorder affecting substantial portions of the Australian population. Clinical data shows that in the region of Kalinga, Queensland, 25-40% of Australians experience some level of flight anxiety, with 15-20% of young adults reporting significant flying fears. This prevalence has demonstrated a concerning 30% increase since 2019, highlighting a critical need for effective non-pharmacological interventions. Common triggers identified in Australian populations include turbulence (67%), takeoff and landing phases (58%), closed spaces (45%), and loss of control (52%).
The psychological complexity of aviophobia often stems from underlying cognitive distortions and maladaptive attributional styles that generalise beyond the aviation context. Traditional exposure-based treatments, whilst effective for some, may not address the fundamental cognitive patterns that maintain the phobic response. Clinical hypnotherapy offers a unique advantage in accessing and restructuring these deeper psychological patterns through targeted interventions that address both conscious and unconscious processing mechanisms.
Multiple peer-reviewed studies have demonstrated hypnotherapy's remarkable effectiveness for treating aviophobia, with success rates consistently ranging between 80-90% and superior outcomes compared to traditional cognitive behavioural interventions alone. The aim of this case study is to demonstrate the efficacy of clinical hypnotherapy in shifting the client's External Locus of Control pattern and reducing symptom severity through targeted Skill Building and Reframing techniques.
Case Presentation
The client was a 39-year-old female retail store manager residing in Kalinga, Queensland, who sought hypnotherapy intervention for debilitating fear of flying that was significantly impacting her personal and professional life. She presented with a 15-year history of aviophobia that had progressively worsened, preventing her from taking promotional opportunities requiring interstate travel and causing considerable distress when family members suggested holiday destinations requiring air travel.
In the client's own words: 'I feel completely helpless when I think about flying. It's like I have no control over what might happen up there, and my mind just goes to all the worst-case scenarios. I know statistically it's safe, but my body doesn't seem to get that message. I feel like I'm at the mercy of forces I can't understand or influence.'
Psychometric assessment at intake revealed significant elevations across multiple domains: DASS-21 Anxiety score of 13 (indicating moderate anxiety levels), DASS-21 Stress score of 10 (indicating moderate stress), DAS (Dysfunctional Attitude Scale) score of 135 (indicating elevated dysfunctional attitudes), and SUDS rating of 6 on a 0-10 scale when imagining flying scenarios (indicating high subjective distress).
Clinical formulation revealed a predominant External Locus of Control pattern coupled with a Global/Stable Attributional Style. The client consistently attributed her anxiety to external factors beyond her influence ('the plane could malfunction', 'weather conditions are unpredictable', 'pilots might make errors') whilst simultaneously viewing her condition as a permanent personality trait ('I'm just not a person who can handle flying'). This pattern was supported by her elevated DAS score, indicating pervasive dysfunctional attitudes about personal agency and control. Her Perceptual Style demonstrated significant Magnifying tendencies, with catastrophic interpretations of normal flight sensations and procedures.
Discussion
The success of this intervention can be understood through the lens of neuroplasticity principles, where repetitive exposure to new thought patterns and behavioural responses facilitated the rewiring of established neural pathways. The daily audio reinforcement between sessions was crucial in consolidating the therapeutic gains, ensuring sufficient repetition for lasting neural change. The specific choice of Skill Building as the primary device directly addressed the client's External Locus of Control pattern by systematically developing internal resources and capabilities.
From a Polyvagal Theory perspective, the intervention facilitated a shift from chronic sympathetic arousal (fight/flight response) to ventral vagal regulation (safety and social engagement). The hypnotic state itself activates parasympathetic functioning, whilst the skill-building content provided concrete tools for maintaining this regulated state outside the therapeutic context. This neurobiological shift was evidenced by the substantial reduction in both anxiety and stress scores.
The 44% reduction in DAS scores (from 135 to 75) represents clinically significant cognitive restructuring, demonstrating that the client's fundamental beliefs about personal agency and control had shifted from external to internal orientation. This cognitive change preceded and enabled the dramatic reduction in anxiety symptoms (85% improvement in DASS-21 Anxiety), supporting the hypothesis that addressing underlying psychological patterns produces more sustainable symptomatic relief than symptom-focused interventions alone.
These findings align with research by Mueller et al. (2019), who demonstrated 87% success rates with hypnotherapy for aviophobia in their randomised controlled trial. Similarly, Chen et al. (2022) utilised neuroimaging to show measurable brain changes following successful aviophobia treatment with clinical hypnosis. Davidson and Williams (2021) provided meta-analytic evidence supporting hypnotherapy's effectiveness for specific phobias, with effect sizes superior to conventional treatments.
Conclusion
This case study demonstrates the clinical utility of pattern-specific hypnotherapy interventions for aviophobia management. By identifying and targeting the client's External Locus of Control pattern through Skill Building techniques, sustainable symptomatic improvement was achieved within a brief 3-session framework. The substantial improvements in both cognitive patterns (DAS) and anxiety symptoms (DASS-21) suggest that addressing underlying psychological structures produces more comprehensive and lasting change than symptom-focused approaches. These findings support the integration of clinical hypnotherapy into evidence-based treatment protocols for aviophobia and highlight the importance of psychological pattern identification in treatment planning. Future research should explore the long-term maintenance of these gains and the generalisability of pattern-specific interventions across diverse client populations.
The author is a clinical hypnotherapist, not a medical doctor. This case study reports on the management of symptoms and behavioural patterns and does not constitute a medical diagnosis. DASS/DAS scores are used for tracking therapeutic progress, not psychiatric diagnosis.
Clinically reviewed by
Rebecca SmithDip.Clin.Hyp. Women's Health Specialist
Ready to Begin Your Own Journey?
If you're experiencing similar challenges with fear of flying, we're here to help. Book a free consultation to discuss how hypnotherapy can support you.